The Cheapest Renovation

One of these days, the legislature will see the wisdom of fully funding all of MSMS’ dreams. Until then, I suspect that the least expensive way to improve MSMS involves its mental landscapes–that is, changing its curriculum. Our school currently meets or exceeds the requirements for Carnegie units necessary for admission to Mississippi’s four-year colleges. As a result, the breadth of an MSMS is impressive.

However, I’ve heard colleagues toy with the idea that we spread students too thin–that it may be beneficial to ask students to reduce the breadth of their content and to focus on specific topics during their senior years. This would only be possible if we completely revised the curriculum. What would happen if students were required to take a semester each of biology, chemistry, and physics instead of a year each? A year of English at MSMS instead of two? Would students be well-served to focus on their specific research interests during their senior years instead of taking courses across the curriculum?

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

#Metoo meanderings

Last week’s Kavanaugh hearings ripped the band-aid off the sores of senatorial civility. Writers for the cold open for Saturday Night Live didn’t have to modify transcripts of the hearings much to get thirteen minutes of material. It was hard to know whether we should laugh or cry.

The most heated part of the week, of course, came when Dr. Christine Blassey Ford testified that Mr. Kavanaugh had assaulted her while the two were in high school. One Mississippi state representative, Greg Snowden (R-Meridian), was so captivated by it that he wrecked his car because he tried to drive and keep track of his news feed at the same time.

Unless this week’s FBI investigation produces a revelation that at least one Senator to change from a “yes” to a “no” vote, Mr. Kavanaugh will be confirmed to the highest court in the land. As such, the confirmation hearings may ultimately be remembered as a crystallization of the #meetoo movement in American politics. 

That movement has been viewed with great suspicion and great admiration. The founders of the movement describe it this way:

The me too movement has built a community of survivors from all walks of life. By bringing vital conversations about sexual violence into the mainstream, we’re helping to de-stigmatize survivors by highlighting the breadth and impact sexual violence has on thousands of women, and we’re helping those who need it to find entry points to healing. Ultimately, with survivors at the forefront of this movement, we’re aiding the fight to end sexual violence. We want to uplift radical community healing as a social justice issue and are committed to disrupting all systems that allow sexual violence to flourish.

One critic, Camille Paglia, has a different point of view

The big question is whether the present wave of revelations, often consisting of unsubstantiated allegations from decades ago, will aid women’s ambitions in the long run or whether it is already creating further problems by reviving ancient stereotypes of women as hysterical, volatile and vindictive.

My philosophy of equity feminism demands removal of all barriers to women’s advancement in the political and professional realms. However, I oppose special protections for women in the workplace. Treating women as more vulnerable, virtuous or credible than men is reactionary, regressive and ultimately counterproductive.

Complaints to the Human Resources department after the fact are no substitute for women themselves drawing the line against offensive behavior — on the spot and in the moment. Working-class women are often so dependent on their jobs that they cannot fight back, but there is no excuse for well-educated, middle-class women to elevate career advantage or fear of social embarrassment over their own dignity and self-respect as human beings. Speak up now, or shut up later! Modern democracy is predicated on principles of due process and the presumption of innocence.

Does either perspective appeal to students more? Is there a better way to articulate what the #meetoo movement will mean in their everyday lives?

Posted in Uncategorized | 12 Comments

A Different Kind of Economy

When John Bel Edwards became governor of Louisiana in 2015, the economy was so bad that he floated the idea of shutting down the football programs at public universities.

That got people’s attention. As the result of eight years of tax cuts under the previous governor, Bobby Jindal, the state faced a mid-year shortfall of $850 million. Gov. Edwards convinced the state legislature to approve a 1% increase in the sales tax, and to rescind some of Jindal’s cuts, as a means of making the government solvent. Results have been good–although a sunset clause in the sales tax will result in another massive shortfall if it isn’t brought back in the next session.

Nonetheless, Gov. Edwards has a gift for seeing what his citizens want, prioritizing space in the budget for those things, and making them realities. It cost significant political capital, but he made sure that Louisiana expanded Medicaid. He has done what he can to make Louisiana’s major industries better stewards of the environment. Most recently, he announced that the Louisiana School for Math, Science, and the Arts, would have funding for a $27 million dormitory that can house approximately 370 students.

I am delighted for my alma mater. I’m also extremely jealous. I wonder what it would take for Mississippi to make a similar investment in the well-being of MSMS. Hooper hasn’t been given more than ad hoc repairs since my arrival in 2004. Return vents are clogged with two decades of grit; ceiling tiles are discolored; central air and heat are as suspect here as they are in the dorms. And the dorms, of course, are in worse shape. Not Mary Wilson bad, perhaps, but bad nonetheless. Isn’t it ironic that the best school in the state–the sixth-best in the nation–has a smaller budget than many C- and D-rated districts around the state?

Last week, we learned that LSMSA had seven national merit semi-finalists–not quite half the number we had at MSMS. Perhaps Mississippi should commit $54 million to the renovations we need so desperately. One could make the argument that we’ve accomplished twice as much.

So, here’s my question for student bloggers: other than getting legislators to (try to) sleep in your dorms or pass one of your classes, how can we get them to prioritize the needs that we have?

Posted in Uncategorized | 18 Comments

Freedom From What?

As a recovering journalist, I’ve often embraced the notion that if you’re not pissing people off, you’re probably not doing your job. Newspapers and news networks must ferret out uncomfortable truths, present them objectively, and allow our democratic processes to figure out solutions. In many cases, parties must compromise for this to happen. In rare cases, the wrongs are so absolute that no compromise is possible. Consider the case of Curtis Flowers, an African-American who has spent most of his adult life on death row for a crime that very few people believe he committed. It just so happens that one of them is district attorney Doug Evans. If he is ever exonerated for these murders, it will be because of a reporter who believes the system failed him.

I’m also convinced that students learn best when they’re pushed outside of their comfort zones. However, an increasing number of students around the country do not want their buttons pushed. Greg Lukianoff, co-author of The Coddling of the American Mind, has documented profoundly negative reactions on the part of students whose ideas get challenged.

I’m curious: what’s the explanation for students eschewing ideas that challenge their own? 

Posted in Uncategorized | 13 Comments

The Longest Minute

Ole Miss is hosting a one-minute film competition for high school students. Entries are due Sept. 21, and, according to the official release, “can be narrative, documentary, experimental or even promotional, but whatever the style, they must be under 60 seconds, including titles and credits.”

Most of us can hold our breath for sixty seconds–it doesn’t seem enough time to tell a story. But short films can be wonderful, and I’ll be happy to help anyone who’s interested in competing.

There are, by the way, cash prizes for winners.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Take Off the Gloves

Just a quick note on the blog entries I’ve seen thus far: y’all are agreeing with each other (and me) way too often. Feel freer to disagree. (Civilly, of course.)

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Untaming of the Shrew

Tennis and golf are notoriously stuffy, country club sports that depend on the notion of exclusivity for their appeal. If you don’t believe me, compare the advertisers for televised golf with those for football or baseball. The rules of golf and tennis demand mannerly comportment and emphasize good form instead of emotion, and a love of those rules placed Carlos Ramos at the center of international controversy this weekend.

Ramos, the chair umpire for the U.S. Open tennis final between Serena Williams and Naomi Osaka, issued code violations and costly penalties against Williams. Williams has already drawn the ire of tennis traditionalists everywhere. She grunts as she swings. She wears clothes deemed immodest. She has the gall to question authority. When Ramos issued her a “coaching” violation–in professional tennis, players are not to receive instruction from their coaches during a match–she immediately denied communicating with her coach.

I believe her. Williams’ coach, Patrick Mouratoglou, later admitted that he was trying to use hand gestures to encourage her to move six inches from the baseline. However, he added that all coaches do it, and that Williams never noticed him. (Incidentally, that’s why I believe Williams’ account. In all my years as a volunteer coach, I have learned that once people step onto the field of play, they ignore coaches. Seriously. Coaches would have an easier time getting a dog to stop drooling when he sees a treat than getting a player to listen during a game.)

Later, Williams smashed a racquet after losing a critical point. This is an obvious code violation, and because it was her second of the match, she was a assessed a one-point penalty. That cost her a game. When she argued with the umpire over the first violation, she was assessed a one-game penalty, which gave her opponent an insurmountable two-game lead.

Williams has since praised her opponent. Naomi Osaka certainly proved herself worthy of a championship, whether Ramos inserted himself into the match or not. But she has also directed her powerful anger at the sexism involved in the way Ramos–and tennis federations everywhere–treated her. As she pointed out to tournament officials during a heated conversation, “Do you know how many other men do things that are — that do much worse than that?” she said to Kelso. “This is not fair. There’s a lot of men out here that have said a lot of things, but if they’re men, that doesn’t happen to them.”

She has a point. Within tennis, pay equity and sartorial standards have long been issues. Men also get away with saying far worse things to officials without any reprimand. The chief executive of the Women’s Tennis Association has affirmed it. Williams also has belabored under a double standard regarding shows of emotion. When men do it, they’re proud and assertive; women who show emotion tend to be branded as hysterical.

Such issues hold true in other sports. Men regularly get paid more for their athletic achievements in the same sport–and sometimes for their failures. If the perennially under-achieving U.S. men’s national team got paid what the three-time world champion women received, maybe they’d play a little hungrier.

Of course, Williams has been a lightning rod for the sport. She is outspoken, incredibly successful, and usually right.

Posted in Uncategorized | 12 Comments

The New Un-Civility

Most of us with any home training wince when we reflect on the kinds of things Donald Trump has said about women, immigrants, the FBI–about anybody who isn’t Donald Trump, or a current Trump sycophant. Part of the reason some people believe that he is unfit to serve as president lies in his inability to filter out vulgar or impolitic statements and tweets. 

So, by disrupting Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination hearings yesterday, Democrats lost some of the moral high ground they had claimed when it comes to Trump’s lack of well-heeled rhetoric or behavior. Traditionally, nominees to the court bring family members to savor the upside of the nomination before the hearings turn into partisan grillings. Laudatory statements get read. Backs get slapped. The family members leave with proud smiles on their faces.

Yesterday, protestors who embrace progressive causes became so obstreperous that Kavanaugh’s wife and children left. Democrats on the judiciary committee repeatedly interrupted opening statements to ask that the hearing itself be delayed. I may be sympathetic to some of their causes–certainly not all of them!–but I object to their methods. Their behavior yesterday amounts to making rude, symbolic gestures–the equivalent of a “screw you” checkmate in chess, made only to delay an inevitable loss. They do not have the votes to delay the hearings or derail the nomination; those votes will fall on party lines. Furthermore, trying to shout down opponents is hardly the way to win converts. In fact, it’s simply more likely to make compromise (and effective governance) between the parties less tenable.

The seeds of this discontent were planted long ago. Look back at the Bork and Thomas confirmations if you wish–or, more recently, think about the way Republicans refused even to consider an Obama nominee at the end of his presidency. Regardless, the leaders of both parties must express more concern for governance than grandstanding. If Hamilton could bring Jefferson and Madison into the room where the sausage got made and the plans got laid, then today’s leaders ought to be able to do the same.

Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Comments

Wednesday Classes

Great news: Jack’s surgery was a success. However, we will have to stay overnight, which means that I will not meet with classes tomorrow. Seniors: please turn in your personal narratives on Friday. Shakespeare students: please be ready to discuss through Act III on Friday. UE students: don’t forget to read Cotton Mather for Friday. 

Thursday and Friday classes are likely to feature a brief quiz.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Taking Away Your (Library) Card

The City of  Columbus and Lowdnes County have been engaged in an open war for about a year. They’ve squabbled over the language of the restaurant tax, which resulted in significant reduction in the amount of money allocated to the Columbus Visitor’s Bureau. Then they argued over who should pay for the maintenance of the soccer fields, which the county recently agreed to manage. Next, they fought over whether or not the language of tax agreements would reduce the millage devoted to Columbus Public Schools. Now, they’re bickering over whether or not the city is footing its fair share of costs associated with running the library.

In short, you could argue that county leaders believe that the people running the city are guilty of mis-, mal-, or nonfeasance, or that they’re generally incapable, or both. Or you could argue that people in the county merely want their money to be spent in the county. Regardless, the conflicts hurt area residents where they will feel it most painfully and for the longest amount of time: the institutions dedicated to educating and improving the lives of young people.

If people in the county want continued growth and development in the county to continue, starving the city for tax revenues is hardly the wisest policy to pursue in the long term. Conversely, the city needs to be more transparent regarding the wisdom of its stewardship. Both parties are to blame. As with any divorce, the children will suffer the most.

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments